Writing Features

  • Prices starting at just $10/page
  • More than 600 professional writers
  • Overnight delivery option
  • Money back guarantee
  • Free revisions according to our Revision Policy
  • Plagiarism Free guarantee

Toll Free Phone US
+1-866-864-2172

Toll-free Phone UK
+44-122-780-75-86

Phone and chat working hours:
Mon 00:00 — Sat 13:00 (GMT)

Argumentative Essay on Paul Pillar’s Recommendations

In order to become a solid academic writer you must practice academic writing and improve your knowledge. To prepare a strong argumentative essay on Paul Pillar’s recommendations, we suggest you check out our sample argumentative essay on Paul Pillar’s recommendations, which is offered to you entirely free. You do not need to pay anything if you wish to download any of the pages when browsing on our website, or in order to open any of the essays.

Pillar’s Recommendations

“Paul Pillar, a veteran in CIA is known to have voiced his opinions, ideas and recommendation on terrorism and the foreign policy of the U.S. in many instances through books, articles on magazines and reviews. The fact that he is a professional in this field is a surety enough of the quality of the contents in his recommendations. For instance, he identifies some necessary elements needed in the counterterrorist policy examining the main reason as to why United States of America has remained to be a prime target. Pillar delineates why the policies employed in counterterrorist measures are not always the most effective and fruitful. Pillar’s main point concerning terrorism is that it is impossible to defeat terrorism but only to mitigate, reduce, attenuate and control it. He is well known for delineating the three complementary factors that generate the threat of terrorism namely; Jihadsm contributing radical Islam activists, cultural imperialism and social, political and economic conditions. Pillar built up his statements that come as recommendations through formal publications in analysis and solutions to these factors. Therefore, it is quintessential that the recommendation from such an experienced professional taken into account and given good treatment.

Pillar recommends need for a lucid delineation between policy and intelligence. For instance, he notes, “In many ways, Intelligence affects the interests of the nation through its policy effects. No matter how extensive the while process of gathering intelligence is, the changes will hardly take effect if intelligence role towards policymaking process becomes neglected. Nevertheless, few steps, that are based on recognizing that intelligence-policy relationship lies broken, could reduce a likelihood of similar breakdown recurring.” On the same note, he notes that UK exemplifies where highlights regarding this issue is pronounced asserting permanently that intelligence service needs not to be integrated in the public advocacy. Pillar suggests that America should follow the suit equivalent to such issues and need to take a form of congressional resolution and the White House to second the resolution. Even if it would not carry an immediate legal force, a statement that that nature would end up discouraging the future administration from trying to pull intelligence community into advocating for the policies. The CIA veteran notes that it would also be a form of leverage to the intelligence officers in their efforts to resist similar attempts in the future.

Pillar insists on a change on the way the congress handles such delicate matters. While the Congress has the normal tendency of delaying on intelligence availed to them and not following up, Pillar insists that it is a great weakness and inadequacy from the government. For instance, he notes, “The apposite relationship existing between policymaking and gathering sharply makes the functions separate… Congress, not the administration when questioned concerning the infamous 2002 National Intelligence Estimate on the unconventional weapons program in Iraq, it is surprising that only few members of Congress managed to read it. Based on the report from several congressional aides in charge of safeguarding the classified materials, a number not exceeding six senators and few House members got access to more than five page executive summary.”1 While CIA insisted on being politicization ombudsman, Pillar denotes that the function is defined informally and primarily paying attention to the internal concern regarding summarizing and politicization for senior officials in the CIA. While Pillar believe that the intelligence oversight committee needs to play an important role, it is unfortunate that the sensitive partisanship has been so much bedeviled and Capitol Hill works has inhibited a lot of activities in this area.

Use Our Academic Writing Service

Writingtoserve.net has established a collection of free of charge examples of the best written papers, to supply you with actual examples of any kind of written paper, for example, our argumentative essay on Paul Pillar’s recommendations sample. When we originally began creating our writing manuals, we figured out that we must give samples of how all the guidelines, tips and recommendations from our manuals may be practically applied. Now, in cooperation with mentors, freelance experts and academic personnel, we started our data base of absolutely free examples. Check out our argumentative essay on Paul Pillar’s recommendations sample and if you like the work, you have the opportunity to buy the same brilliant paper at a low and flexible price. Simply place your order, list your needs and instructions, and that’s all!